This has been resolved. Spamina replied and said that the problems were a result of the 'connection's service provider' at their end and that it has been fixed. Indeed, I am no longer seeing the errors in Mercury's output window. They said they will provide more details when they have them.

Hooray :)

SOLVED!

I had to untick (in Thunderbird) Tools -> Account settings -> Server settings ->

Advanced -> "show only subscribed folders".
Now I can see all

folders.

[quote user="Rolf Lindby"]

In Mercury a folder can contain either messages or sub-folders but not both, so you need to keep that in mind.

/Rolf 

[/quote]

Thanks.. I've adjusted accordingly.

[quote user="PaulW"]

An even simpler method would be to script a .cnm removal after the filedate is older than n days - where 'n' is chosen to fit in with the the characterisitics of the users.  (I presume that the default setting of only offering "unread" mail is already in force!)[/quote]

Yes but how can you be sure that the mail has been downloaded (the user can be on vacation...) ? many years ago when a mail was read the filename changed to the same but the first letter was changed (I can't remember for what letter) so it was easy to see if a mail has been read/downloaded or not, now when a mail is read (under Pegasus Mail) or downloaded by Mercury a X-PMFLAGS: header is added and the utility I mentionned open the .cnm files searching for this header and its content.

Best regards

Thank you and a Happy New Year!

If you can find some kind of pattern behind the crashes we will be happy to investigate it. If we saw that behavior ourselves we would of course already have done so. As you probably realize there is no way to add more logging everywhere.

Generally speaking Mercury will not approve if some other process interferes with disk access or network access, so this is why we recommend that any realtime antivirus software should be switched off. If there are a lot of content control rules you could try deactivating them to see if that makes any difference. 

/Rolf 

Thank you for prompt reply !

I would prefer to work on mail addresses rather IP because these IP ranges are dinamically assigned.

I will try to proceed with PaulW's suggestion (tag + filtering rule), hope to resolve my problem ... [:)]

Will feedback the result.

ALex.

I was thinking of trying Mercury in that fashion, will post results.

Rolf, got it.! thank you for explanning!!!!!

[quote user="alexalbert"]In My Personnel opinion you should try Incredimail Service. Incredimail is advance feature mail program that offers you interactive experience.It have many feature like notifier, letters, animation, emotions and many more. Incredimail user can get help from the incredimail help team at 24X7.
[/quote]

Incredimail is a mail client and has nothing to do with the original poster's problem with the mail server.

Your message reads just like a product advert - is that what you wanted?

David Harris has posted some current information about the next version of Mercury in the development blog!

http://community.pmail.com/blogs/mercury32/default.aspx 

/Rolf 

It doesn't - normaly it's not neccessary. If Pegasus can't send a message (even after several retries), the sender of the message will get an errormail. Depending of Mercurys configuration it will include parts of (most headers) or whole mail.

For purposes of finding a problem you may activate the session log. Than ALL mails will be saved in a file. But in most countries due to privacy policies you are not allowed to activate that feature for ever.

bye   Olaf

Thank you Rolf.

1. Windows XP is fine. No limit for simultaneous connections applies to the ports used by a mail server.

2. I didn't try that but as long as Linux allows the VM access to all required ports it should be OK.

/Rolf 

Mine does not ;-)

Just being curious: Do you have a link showing how this would look like?

Konrad

There were NO attachments shown at all.

Cannot share more details since I got rid of Win 8 ;-). Went back to Win 7...

Thanks anyway

Konrad

You can easily script it.

Regards

JavaMail is a used to send and receive email via SMTP, POP3 and IMAP. JavaMail is built into the Java EE platform, but also provides an optional package for use in Java SE. You may refer to the code below.

import java.util.*;
import javax.mail.*;
import javax.mail.internet.*;
import javax.activation.*;
// Send a simple, single part, text/plain e-mail
public class TestEmail {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        // SUBSTITUTE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESSES HERE!!!
        String to = "sendToMailAddress";
        String from = "sendFromMailAddress";
        // SUBSTITUTE YOUR ISP'S MAIL SERVER HERE!!!
        String host = "smtp.yourisp.invalid";
        // Create properties, get Session
        Properties props = new Properties();
        // If using static Transport.send(),
        // need to specify which host to send it to
        props.put("mail.smtp.host", host);
        // To see what is going on behind the scene
        props.put("mail.debug", "true");
        Session session = Session.getInstance(props);
        try {
            // Instantiate a message
            Message msg = new MimeMessage(session);
            //Set message attributes
            msg.setFrom(new InternetAddress(from));
            InternetAddress[] address = {new InternetAddress(to)};
            msg.setRecipients(Message.RecipientType.TO, address);
            msg.setSubject("Test E-Mail through Java");
            msg.setSentDate(new Date());
            // Set message content
            msg.setText("This is a test of sending a " +
                        "plain text e-mail through Java.\n" +
                        "Here is line 2.");
            //Send the message
            Transport.send(msg);
        }
        catch (MessagingException mex) {
            // Prints all nested (chained) exceptions as well
            mex.printStackTrace();
        }
    }
}//End of class

Thanks Rolf,. You edit the path auth.mer with full path the .mer file (C:\xampp\MercuryMail\AUTH.mer ) and fix other setting, Problem solve..thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you

Could it be that rule conditions are a bit too wide, so that it triggers once for the list and again when the message is delivered to each list member?

/Rolf