Community Discussions and Support
Help! Pegasus on Linux: Letter salad on v4.80 and later?

Hello:



@ AI345:
There has been an update at WineHQ Bugzilla for your report (60506).
Still unconfirmed, its has been downgraded from [P2 blocker] to [P2 normal].
Best,
S.


Hello: [quote="pid:59243, uid:36421"] Done: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60506 [/quote] @ AI345: There has been an [update](https://bugs.winehq.org/show_activity.cgi?id=60506) at WineHQ Bugzilla for your report (60506). Still unconfirmed, its has been downgraded from [P2 blocker] to [P2 normal]. Best, S.
edited 1 day ago at 7:38 am

Think this tread has lots of conflicting info.


What I see is this:
Linux Devuan Daedalus+Wine-8+Pegasus Mail 4.73 -> works
Linux Devuan Daedalus+Wine-8+Pegasus Mail 4.80 -> does not work
Linux Devuan Daedalus+Wine-8+Pegasus Mail 4.81 -> does not work
Linux Devuan Daedalus+Wine-8+Pegasus Mail 4.91 -> does not work
*Debian 8.0~repack-4 from the Devuan Linux repositories


Don't know anything of this release of Linux or why it is showing Wine-8?


Wine is at version 11 not 8.


I tried the steps listed in Bug report and I see text just fine.
Fedora 44 currently running Wine 11.22 development, but also works with the 11 stable.
rpm -qa | grep wine
wine-filesystem-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-tahoma-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-times-new-roman-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-wingdings-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-webdings-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-system-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-symbol-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-small-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-ms-sans-serif-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-marlett-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-fixedsys-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-courier-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-arial-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-wingdings-fonts-system-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-times-new-roman-fonts-system-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-tahoma-fonts-system-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-mono-11.3.0-1.fc44.noarch
wine-systemd-11.20-1.fc44.noarch
wine-devel-11.22-1.1.x86_64
winehq-devel-11.22-1.1.x86_64


So, don't know exactly what wine is suppose to do. If this release is locked in a 3 major versions old release of wine.


I get


uname -a
Linux setzcodell.dyndns.org 7.3.4-200.fc44.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Nov 10 22:45:35 UTC 2026 x86_64 GNU/Linux


What does the distro with the problem showing?


What is the CPU.


Fedora uses dnf5 is this distro use apt or other package manager.
Have done some bugzilla reports and the issues were resolved, but don't see enough info to see exactly what the issue falls under.


Good Luck.


Think this tread has lots of conflicting info. What I see is this: Linux Devuan Daedalus+Wine-8+Pegasus Mail 4.73 -> works Linux Devuan Daedalus+Wine-8+Pegasus Mail 4.80 -> does not work Linux Devuan Daedalus+Wine-8+Pegasus Mail 4.81 -> does not work Linux Devuan Daedalus+Wine-8+Pegasus Mail 4.91 -> does not work *Debian 8.0~repack-4 from the Devuan Linux repositories Don't know anything of this release of Linux or why it is showing Wine-8? Wine is at version 11 not 8. I tried the steps listed in Bug report and I see text just fine. Fedora 44 currently running Wine 11.22 development, but also works with the 11 stable. rpm -qa | grep wine wine-filesystem-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-tahoma-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-times-new-roman-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-wingdings-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-webdings-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-system-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-symbol-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-small-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-ms-sans-serif-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-marlett-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-fixedsys-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-courier-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-arial-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-winefonts-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-wingdings-fonts-system-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-times-new-roman-fonts-system-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-tahoma-fonts-system-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-mono-11.3.0-1.fc44.noarch wine-systemd-11.20-1.fc44.noarch wine-devel-11.22-1.1.x86_64 winehq-devel-11.22-1.1.x86_64 So, don't know exactly what wine is suppose to do. If this release is locked in a 3 major versions old release of wine. I get uname -a Linux setzcodell.dyndns.org 7.3.4-200.fc44.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Nov 10 22:45:35 UTC 2026 x86_64 GNU/Linux What does the distro with the problem showing? What is the CPU. Fedora uses dnf5 is this distro use apt or other package manager. Have done some bugzilla reports and the issues were resolved, but don't see enough info to see exactly what the issue falls under. Good Luck.

mikes@guam.net

Hello:


Think this tread has lots of conflicting info.

No.
It does not.
[/quote]



Don't know anything of this release of Linux or why it is showing Wine-8?

If you don't know in spite of having been explained to you both by me (at least once) and by AI345 (more that once), please take a breath and read the thread again.
That said, I would respectfully ask that you stop muddying the waters. 8^°


Best,


S.


Hello: [quote="pid:59353, uid:2546"] Think this tread has lots of conflicting info. [/quote] No. It does not. [/quote] [quote="pid:59353, uid:2546"] Don't know anything of this release of Linux or why it is showing Wine-8? [/quote] If you _don't know_ in spite of having been explained to you both by me (at least once) and by AI345 (more that once), please take a breath and read the thread again. That said, I would respectfully ask that you stop muddying the waters. 8^° Best, S.

Guess you are much smarter than me. Seems the locked in Wine8 for some reason, though the newer wine can be installed, but it then breaks whatever reason the locked at wine 8? So, good luck, but I don't think winehq will bother even looking at it. If you come out with solution would be interested.


Works perfectly on my system.


Guess you are much smarter than me. Seems the locked in Wine8 for some reason, though the newer wine can be installed, but it then breaks whatever reason the locked at wine 8? So, good luck, but I don't think winehq will bother even looking at it. If you come out with solution would be interested. Works perfectly on my system.

mikes@guam.net

There has been an update at WineHQ Bugzilla for your report (60506).
Still unconfirmed, its has been downgraded from [P2 blocker] to [P2 normal].

Translation: "We'll look into that, eventually..." :-(


No surprise since our resident Alzheimer case rushed to tell them there is actually no problem at all.


[quote="pid:59352, uid:28059"]There has been an update at WineHQ Bugzilla for your report (60506). Still unconfirmed, its has been downgraded from [P2 blocker] to [P2 normal].[/quote] Translation: "We'll look into that, _eventually_..." :-( No surprise since our resident Alzheimer case rushed to tell them there is actually no problem at all.

Hello:


Translation: "We'll look into that, eventually..." :-(

Not necessarily so.
I think ...
Looking at the bug severity field list [WineHQ Bugzilla] has, I find these relevant definitions:


blocker     [Blocks development] and/or testing work
critical Critical problem that [prevents all applications] from working
major Major loss of functionality for a [wide range of applications]
normal For an [application] crash or [loss of functionality] ### <- this

I would think that our problem fits the WineHQ's 'normal' definition.
ie: does not affect any application (that we know of) other than Pegasus Mail from v4.80 onwards.
The good news is that it has been looked at and that all the information needed for them to understand what is going on is there.


Best,


S.


Hello: [quote=&quot;pid:59362, uid:36421&quot;] Translation: &quot;We&#039;ll look into that, eventually...&quot; :-( [/quote] Not necessarily so. I think ... Looking at the bug severity [field](https://bugs.winehq.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html#severity) list [WineHQ Bugzilla] has, I find these relevant definitions: ```` blocker [Blocks development] and/or testing work critical Critical problem that [prevents all applications] from working major Major loss of functionality for a [wide range of applications] normal For an [application] crash or [loss of functionality] ### &lt;- this ```` I would think that our problem fits the WineHQ&#039;s &#039;normal&#039; definition. ie: does not affect any application (that we know of) other than Pegasus Mail from v4.80 onwards. The good news is that it has been looked at and that all the information needed for them to understand what is going on is there. Best, S.
edited 55 minutes ago
live preview
enter atleast 10 characters
WARNING: You mentioned %MENTIONS%, but they cannot see this message and will not be notified
Saving...
Saved
With selected deselect posts show selected posts
All posts under this topic will be deleted ?
Pending draft ... Click to resume editing
Discard draft