Well, I think I need to explain a bit why the functionality Outlook offers here is actually a very desired one, at least for me. I have setup a (small) home network, which is controlled by a machine running Windows Home Server. This offers me backup, central web services and other things, based on Win Server 2003 SP2 SBS. In parallel I have to collect0 email from different email accounts, all accessible by POP3/SMTP only (no IMAP funcs). Several of these accounts are for important incoming status emails from remote controlling systems, which are actually processed from two different locations, but without a possibility to implement a static server based on DynDNS or similar thing. In fact, why should I do this, if the ISP is offering this functionality already for free to me??
Besides that, I want to get rid of having to run two computer systems all the time, one being the windows home server (this is running 24/7 anyways) and in parallel another system to pull the POP3 emails from my ISP. As I said, I did this with Outlook in a very convenient way; just pull the email and keep it on the ISP server until the second system also downloaded it. It's just ticking an option box in the Outlook POP3 client setup.
It's no big thing that Mercury cant do it, as I said. At least for me this means simply continuing using Outlook 2007 directly and running two systems (which I was trying to avoid). Besides that I hope Microsoft will finally implement an email component add-in for their Windows Home Server. I expect it will offer the same functionality as Outlook nowadays by then.
Again, thanks for your suggestions!
Lothar
<P>Well, I think I need to explain a bit why the functionality Outlook offers here is actually a very desired one, at least for me. I have setup a (small) home network, which is controlled by a machine running Windows Home Server. This offers me backup, central web services and other things, based on Win Server 2003 SP2 SBS. In parallel I have to&nbsp;collect0 email from different email accounts, all accessible by POP3/SMTP only (no IMAP funcs).&nbsp;Several of these accounts&nbsp;are for important incoming status emails from remote controlling systems, which&nbsp;are actually processed from two different locations, but without a possibility to implement a static server based on DynDNS or similar thing. In fact, why should I do this, if the ISP is offering this functionality already for free to me??</P>
<P>Besides that, I want to get rid of having to run two computer systems all the time, one being the windows home server (this is running 24/7 anyways) and in parallel another system to pull the POP3 emails from my ISP. As I said, I did this with Outlook in a very convenient way; just pull the email and keep it on the ISP server until the second system also downloaded it. It's just ticking an option box in the Outlook POP3 client setup.</P>
<P>It's no big thing that Mercury cant do it, as I said. At least for me this means simply continuing using Outlook 2007 directly and running two systems (which I was trying to avoid). Besides that I hope Microsoft will finally implement an email component add-in for their Windows Home Server. I expect it will offer the same functionality as Outlook nowadays by then.</P>
<P>Again, thanks for your suggestions!</P>
<P>Lothar</P>
<P mce_keep="true">&nbsp;</P>
<P mce_keep="true">&nbsp;</P>