[quote user="Thomas R. Stephenson"]> A
questionable standard, IMO, reminds me of the hungry mathematician
being left alone with a can of food and no tools in prison: "I define
this can to be open" ...
Not hardly, this was not defined in a vacuum. Since this is the basic e-mail standard and has been like this forever, approved by everyone, I'm not all that sure I would question the standard. [...]
That said, many mailers leave out this field expecting it to be added by the SMTP host. Most MSA do add this Date: header if missing, the latest Mercury does this.[/quote]
Well, it's just my opinion, and your latter note about SMTP hosts clearly indicates that it's circumvented anyway, so this standard appears to be worth exactly ... nothing ... ?
<p>[quote user="Thomas R. Stephenson"]&gt; A
questionable standard, IMO, reminds me of the hungry mathematician
being left alone with a can of food and no tools in prison: "I define
this can to be open" ...</p><p>Not hardly, this was not defined in a vacuum.&nbsp; Since this is the basic e-mail standard and has been like this forever, approved by everyone, I'm not all that sure I would question the standard. [...]</p><p>That said, many mailers leave out this field expecting it to be added by the SMTP host.&nbsp; Most MSA do add this Date: header if missing, the latest Mercury does this.[/quote]</p><p>Well, it's just my opinion, and your latter note about SMTP hosts clearly indicates that it's circumvented anyway, so this standard appears to be worth exactly ... nothing ... ?</p>
Michael
--
IERenderer's Homepage
PGP Key ID (RSA 2048): 0xC45D831B
S/MIME Fingerprint: 94C6B471 0C623088 A5B27701 742B8666 3B7E657C