Community Discussions and Support
Graywall

Understood, thanks for the link.

 

A.

 

<p>Understood, thanks for the link.</p><p> </p><p>A.</p><p> </p>

Hi- I've just upgraded to /32 v4.51, and have installed Graywall.

 

I'm watching the SMTP server windows, and I'm seeing a lot of false positives, i.e. a perfectly valid and non-spam address with the transaction closed by Graywall.

 What are the ramifications of this, and is there anything I should be doing to minimise this?

Thanks

 

Andy.


 

<p>Hi- I've just upgraded to /32 v4.51, and have installed Graywall.</p><p> </p><p>I'm watching the SMTP server windows, and I'm seeing a lot of false positives, i.e. a perfectly valid and non-spam address with the transaction closed by Graywall.</p><p> What are the ramifications of this, and is there anything I should be doing to minimise this?</p><p>Thanks</p><p> </p><p>Andy.</p><p>  </p>

This sounds like perfectly normal Greylisting behaviour.  Normal servers will try again, and will get through after your delay interval.

Read more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greylist

 

<P>This sounds like perfectly normal Greylisting behaviour.  Normal servers will try again, and will get through after your delay interval.</P> <P>Read more at <A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greylist">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greylist</A></P> <P mce_keep="true"> </P>
live preview
enter atleast 10 characters
WARNING: You mentioned %MENTIONS%, but they cannot see this message and will not be notified
Saving...
Saved
With selected deselect posts show selected posts
All posts under this topic will be deleted ?
Pending draft ... Click to resume editing
Discard draft