Spellcheckers have their uses and their limitations. The PMail spellchecker cuts in too soon for me when editing a part-written message. You have, say, a sentence which reads
I think the best solution ...
and you decide you want to insert a few words to make
I think for Fred's sake the best solution ...
You put the cursor at the necessary insertion point and start typing the extra words, only for the spellchecker to take the entirely temporary sequence forthe (after you've typed one word) and change it to for the. I'm no touch-typist, so by the time I look up again at the screen, the sentence has been turned into garbage:
I think for the Fred's sake best solution ...
That's if I'm lucky enough to spot what the idiot spellchecker has done before I send the message. This happens to me a lot, drives me nuts, and I've only just realised why. For comparison, although MS Word's spellchecker will also change forthe to for the, if you edit text as I did above, it does not mess it up. (And I'm no admirer of MS Word.)
David
<p>Spellcheckers have their uses and their limitations. The PMail spellchecker cuts in too soon for me when editing a part-written message. You have, say, a sentence which reads
</p><blockquote><p>I think the best solution ...</p></blockquote><p>and you decide you want to insert a few words to make</p><blockquote><p>I think for Fred's sake the best solution ...</p></blockquote><p>You put the cursor at the necessary insertion point and start typing the extra words, only for the spellchecker to take the entirely temporary sequence <i>forthe</i> (after you've typed one word) and change it to <i>for the</i>. I'm no touch-typist, so by the time I look up again at the screen, the sentence has been turned into garbage:</p><blockquote><p>I think for the Fred's sake best solution ...</p></blockquote><blockquote></blockquote><p>That's if I'm lucky enough to spot what the idiot spellchecker has done before I send the message. This happens to me <b>a lot</b>, drives me nuts, and I've only just realised why. For comparison, although MS Word's spellchecker will also change <i>forthe</i> to <i>for the</i>, if you edit text as I did above, it does <b>not</b> mess it up. (And I'm no admirer of MS Word.)
</p><p>David</p><p>&nbsp;</p>