Mercury works fine connecting to Google via POP3.
Well it doesn't connect well via SMTP! I keep getting TCP/IP errors.
Secondly when GOOGLE tries to connect to MERCURY (not the other way round as you suggest) their gmail web interface complains that it cannot establish a connection - even though my outlook (2003) can. But my friends device couldn't connect with a newer outlook and neither could his gmail. Very odd.
As for having to configure users twice - once for a mailbox and then again for relaying, that's just backwards. Not wanting to offend anyone but its true. The whole idea in programming is to avoid data duplication. A simple checkbox on the user editor allowing them to relay mail would have been great.
The manual is also confusing - authenticated connections can relay... but then only authenticated users can relay... so.. what does that mean? authenticated users can relay if its checked but otherwise only spammers can? lol. So not only does the manual need to be a bit clearer, it also needs to be shorter.
The interface is odd too. Quit it and you can run it as a service.. but to make changes you need to stop the service (thus no mail transfer) and run it as a GUI. That's old-skool! It needs to run as a service 24/7 and have a TCP admin program that connects to it instead.
Of course it doesn't help that the help files don't work on anything past WinXP.
it works great. It is very capable and flexible
Think I'll differ on your view with all respect. It may work great in your eyes but to me it doesn't. I wrote my own SMTP server a while back, it didn't have all the bells and whistles and is nowhere near being ready for a live environment but it worked out of the box with minimal fuss. What i do like about Mercury though is the extensive list of rules / actions. Even though the one this topic is about doesn't work, it's better than those on hmailserver.
[quote="pid:55756, uid:28772"]Mercury works fine connecting to Google via POP3.[/quote]
Well it doesn't connect well via SMTP! I keep getting TCP/IP errors.
Secondly when GOOGLE tries to connect to MERCURY (not the other way round as you suggest) their gmail web interface complains that it cannot establish a connection - even though my outlook (2003) can. But my friends device couldn't connect with a newer outlook and neither could his gmail. Very odd.
As for having to configure users twice - once for a mailbox and then again for relaying, that's just backwards. Not wanting to offend anyone but its true. The whole idea in programming is to avoid data duplication. A simple checkbox on the user editor allowing them to relay mail would have been great.
The manual is also confusing - authenticated connections can relay... but then only authenticated users can relay... so.. what does that mean? authenticated users can relay if its checked but otherwise only spammers can? lol. So not only does the manual need to be a bit clearer, it also needs to be shorter.
The interface is odd too. Quit it and you can run it as a service.. but to make changes you need to stop the service (thus no mail transfer) and run it as a GUI. That's old-skool! It needs to run as a service 24/7 and have a TCP admin program that connects to it instead.
Of course it doesn't help that the help files don't work on anything past WinXP.
[quote="pid:55756, uid:28772"]it works great. It is very capable and flexible[/quote]
Think I'll differ on your view with all respect. It may work great in your eyes but to me it doesn't. I wrote my own SMTP server a while back, it didn't have all the bells and whistles and is nowhere near being ready for a live environment but it worked out of the box with minimal fuss. What i do like about Mercury though is the extensive list of rules / actions. Even though the one this topic is about doesn't work, it's better than those on hmailserver.