Community Discussions and Support
PM 8.9.1 and 8.0 Spambust.dat does not seem to work

I have used PMail for over 30 years as a small bus. I really like Spambust as I can add to it with the latest smam topics. However, I installed PM 8.0 a few months ago and the Spambust soes not re-direct anything to the (Spam or Junk mail ) folder. I have enabled it and even replaced it with a spambust.dat file that worked in the past.


When I run the SYNTAX test I always get the same message that has been there without errors. The (EXPECTED WEIGHT, IF, IFNOT, AND OR ANDNOT) error.
nothing gets sorted or re-directed.
Any help apprecieated.


Mesu


I have used PMail for over 30 years as a small bus. I really like Spambust as I can add to it with the latest smam topics. However, I installed PM 8.0 a few months ago and the Spambust soes not re-direct anything to the (Spam or Junk mail ) folder. I have enabled it and even replaced it with a spambust.dat file that worked in the past. When I run the SYNTAX test I always get the same message that has been there without errors. The (EXPECTED WEIGHT, IF, IFNOT, AND OR ANDNOT) error. nothing gets sorted or re-directed. Any help apprecieated. Mesu

Nothing in this post makes sense. The current version of Pegasus Mail is 4.91. Its built-in anti-spam product is called Spamhalter. I am not aware of an add-on product called Spambust that works with it.


Nothing in this post makes sense. The current version of Pegasus Mail is 4.91. Its built-in anti-spam product is called Spamhalter. I am not aware of an add-on product called Spambust that works with it.

New I had seen spambust
From file spambust.dat (appears in PMAIL Directory) in a number of places
Was looking in help, but didn't really find anything about spambust but most is about spamhaulter. So just first part of it. Don't know if from before spamhaulter or what. I have it disabled on my system. But knew I had seen spambust.


#
# Mercury/32 Basic Content Control rule file.
# Copyright (c) 2002-2003, David Harris; portions copyright (c) 2002 David Kocmoud.
# For information on the syntax and format of this file, please consult
# the "Content control" section of the Mercury/32 Help file.
#
# This set of rules is intended to catch a wide range of unwanted mail
# messages where the content is commercial or sexual in nature. It works
# quite well (at the time of writing anyway) but you will almost certainly
# want or need to adjust it over time to deal with the specific types of
# content you want to filter. This rule set is designed to be used with a
# definition where the trigger weight is set to 50.
#
# Note that many of the rules in this file have negative weights: this is
# a useful way of "promoting" a message that might otherwise be detected
# as having unacceptable content.
#

# Check for "Lazy HTML", almost always a sure sign of spam
if Test "LazyHTML strict" weight 51 tag "Message contains Lazy HTML"

6a35badf482a7


6a35bb36e5f56


New I had seen spambust From file spambust.dat (appears in PMAIL Directory) in a number of places Was looking in help, but didn't really find anything about spambust but most is about spamhaulter. So just first part of it. Don't know if from before spamhaulter or what. I have it disabled on my system. But knew I had seen spambust. ```` # # Mercury/32 Basic Content Control rule file. # Copyright (c) 2002-2003, David Harris; portions copyright (c) 2002 David Kocmoud. # For information on the syntax and format of this file, please consult # the "Content control" section of the Mercury/32 Help file. # # This set of rules is intended to catch a wide range of unwanted mail # messages where the content is commercial or sexual in nature. It works # quite well (at the time of writing anyway) but you will almost certainly # want or need to adjust it over time to deal with the specific types of # content you want to filter. This rule set is designed to be used with a # definition where the trigger weight is set to 50. # # Note that many of the rules in this file have negative weights: this is # a useful way of "promoting" a message that might otherwise be detected # as having unacceptable content. # # Check for "Lazy HTML", almost always a sure sign of spam if Test "LazyHTML strict" weight 51 tag "Message contains Lazy HTML" ```` ![6a35badf482a7](serve/attachment&path=6a35badf482a7) ![6a35bb36e5f56](serve/attachment&path=6a35bb36e5f56)

mikes@guam.net

could compare the file with the other in resource. Files like that can have a single typo that throws off the structure.


What are errors, and do they mention specific lines or words.


could compare the file with the other in resource. Files like that can have a single typo that throws off the structure. What are errors, and do they mention specific lines or words.

mikes@guam.net

OK, I think I'm getting with the program now, that is if this discussion is about Content Control in which spambust.dat is the file that holds the processing rules.


FWIW, I have not seen any reports of Content Control not working in v4.80, v4.81, or v4.91. I don't use it so I don't think I can be of any help. The only thing I that comes to mind is to test it using the default spambust.dat file, a copy of which can be found in \Pmail\Programs\RESOURCE.


OK, I think I'm getting with the program now, that is if this discussion is about Content Control in which spambust.dat is the file that holds the processing rules. FWIW, I have not seen any reports of Content Control not working in v4.80, v4.81, or v4.91. I don't use it so I don't think I can be of any help. The only thing I that comes to mind is to test it using the default spambust.dat file, a copy of which can be found in \Pmail\Programs\RESOURCE.

I agree with that.
Backup spambust.dat and restore the default one.
Then add blocks little at a time to find the exact line or lines that cause problem to return.


Could be a single bad line in the file.
Perhaps upload the file if it doesn't have any private info.


I agree with that. Backup spambust.dat and restore the default one. Then add blocks little at a time to find the exact line or lines that cause problem to return. Could be a single bad line in the file. Perhaps upload the file if it doesn't have any private info.

mikes@guam.net

Did a quick look at my spambust.dat file.
Found a start thing on line 405
Has only UTF character in file has a line
if content contains "penís" weight 51
But the i is not an ascii i, but is


UTF-8 encoding represents the lowercase letter í


Is in the one in resource as well, so wasn't something I added to it.
Could be something that windows now doesn't like?


Did a quick look at my spambust.dat file. Found a start thing on line 405 Has only UTF character in file has a line if content contains "penís" weight 51 But the i is not an ascii i, but is UTF-8 encoding represents the lowercase letter í Is in the one in resource as well, so wasn't something I added to it. Could be something that windows now doesn't like?

mikes@guam.net

Is in the one in resource as well, so wasn't something I added to it.
Could be something that windows now doesn't like?


I think we would have heard other requests for help if this were the case.


A thought I had while dreaming last night was to the action in Content Control. Since you are moving messages to a folder I suggest setting "Do this:" to "Move the message to a folder" then use the Set button to select the folder.


Edit: Good luck. I will be unavailable for about the next 36 hours.


[quote="pid:58961, uid:2546"]Is in the one in resource as well, so wasn't something I added to it. Could be something that windows now doesn't like?[/quote] I think we would have heard other requests for help if this were the case. A thought I had while dreaming last night was to the action in Content Control. Since you are moving messages to a folder I suggest setting "Do this:" to "Move the message to a folder" then use the Set button to select the folder. Edit: Good luck. I will be unavailable for about the next 36 hours.
edited Jun 20 at 11:30 am

Wasn't saying it was that, but that it showed that non-ascii characters can be placed in the file, and if someone add other UTF8 characters into the file it might cause issues. There are 2, 3, and 4 byte UTF8 codes.


Wasn't saying it was that, but that it showed that non-ascii characters can be placed in the file, and if someone add other UTF8 characters into the file it might cause issues. There are 2, 3, and 4 byte UTF8 codes.

mikes@guam.net

Hi
Sorry it took so long to get back, some nurses at our local hospital insisted I pay them a visit.


Thanks for your replies.


I tested several files all unedited. All the mail filtered through it comes through with none sent to junk mail or having the subject field edited in any way as it should.


My thought is that maybe files are sent using UTF8 or another type text. the words in English text and the code for the same word in UTF8 would be different.


I usually use this method because the trends change so fast and I can stop hundreds of spams in an hour Perhaps it has not worked for a while. I tried 4.80 , 4.81, and now 4.91.


I also replaced the spambust,dat file with multiple files that did work as far back as 2003.


Either PMail does not allow use of it anymore, or spammers have changed how text is sent. I am unable to find the issue. NOTE: I will survive this but I thought it never showed up online, and somehow there is an answer rven if it is it will not work anymore.


Thanks everyone.


Mesu


Hi Sorry it took so long to get back, some nurses at our local hospital insisted I pay them a visit. Thanks for your replies. I tested several files all unedited. All the mail filtered through it comes through with none sent to junk mail or having the subject field edited in any way as it should. My thought is that maybe files are sent using UTF8 or another type text. the words in English text and the code for the same word in UTF8 would be different. I usually use this method because the trends change so fast and I can stop hundreds of spams in an hour Perhaps it has not worked for a while. I tried 4.80 , 4.81, and now 4.91. I also replaced the spambust,dat file with multiple files that did work as far back as 2003. Either PMail does not allow use of it anymore, or spammers have changed how text is sent. I am unable to find the issue. NOTE: I will survive this but I thought it never showed up online, and somehow there is an answer rven if it is it will not work anymore. Thanks everyone. Mesu

There have not been any reports that Content Control no longer works in any of the versions you mentioned (4.80, 4.81, 4.91). This may be rudimentary and obvious but please review the Content Control configuration tabs.


  1. A content testing set is enabled and it applies to all mail.Note: Mine is disabled, obviously. 6a401f16c826b6a40201189116

  2. There is nothing unusual about the Exceptions tab settings. Normally "black.pml" and "white.pml" are the selected black and white list files. You might want to review their content with the Edit buttons.6a4020a7b03c2

  3. The spambust.dat file is selected in the Message tests tab settings, and that you selected it using the Browse button and didn't just type the filename in.6a40210e53463

  4. The settings in the Action tab are as you want, and, if moving to a folder, that the folder showing in the Parameter field was selected by using the Set button.6a4022692bdd2


There have not been any reports that Content Control no longer works in any of the versions you mentioned (4.80, 4.81, 4.91). This may be rudimentary and obvious but please review the Content Control configuration tabs. 1. A content testing set is enabled and it applies to all mail. Note: Mine is disabled, obviously. ![6a401f16c826b](serve/attachment&path=6a401f16c826b) ![6a40201189116](serve/attachment&path=6a40201189116) 2. There is nothing unusual about the Exceptions tab settings. Normally "black.pml" and "white.pml" are the selected black and white list files. You might want to review their content with the Edit buttons. ![6a4020a7b03c2](serve/attachment&path=6a4020a7b03c2) 3. The spambust.dat file is selected in the Message tests tab settings, and that you selected it using the Browse button and didn't just type the filename in. ![6a40210e53463](serve/attachment&path=6a40210e53463) 4. The settings in the Action tab are as you want, and, if moving to a folder, that the folder showing in the Parameter field was selected by using the Set button. ![6a4022692bdd2](serve/attachment&path=6a4022692bdd2)
live preview
enter atleast 10 characters
WARNING: You mentioned %MENTIONS%, but they cannot see this message and will not be notified
Saving...
Saved
With selected deselect posts show selected posts
All posts under this topic will be deleted ?
Pending draft ... Click to resume editing
Discard draft