The behaviour is the same in PM462.

After a while begins to delay the button redraw but if I rename PNG folder, the button bar get the old aspect (with shade, or trapezium shape) without delay but if I use the boilerplate function PM begins to flash and I can't stop.

Aldo

[quote user="aga60"]

I agree.

I've renamed  PNG folder and PM461 works fine till I have use boilerplate function.

At that time PM begins to flash and there is no way to stop it.

Aldo

I've sent to beta-reports@pmail.gen.nz

As the time goes, time needed to redraw icon bar increases.

May be that the key pressed is not detected till icon bar redraw ends?

And if pressed before it (before the redraw end) it stay in a state that prevents the keypress event?

Aldo

Nice feature ... but not that way. :-(

Environment: PM461 (still testing) with NDS-Module, central installation on Novell Netware 6.5 with mailboxes in users homedirectory on server.

We extensively use several mailaccounts with IMAP. For one of those (our central mailaccount of university) I know the limitations set by provider of services. On other (most times private) accounts the user should have the opportunity to set those limits. So ... the sizelimit is individual to the mailaccount ... not to the registry of any windows-installation.

My suggestion: There should (may be alternatively or additionaly) be a possibility to set those limits in PMAIL.INI (-> options in pegasus) for every identity in users configuration of pegasus. May be the settings in registry have high priority, but may be set lower per identity by the user. If there are no settings in registry, the only limit is that per identity.

just my 2 cent

    Olaf

one trick that may help you (if you know the name of the file to be attached) is to start typing the name, this will then narrowdown the files in the drop down to those starting with 'XXX'. Use this all the time. YMMV

Ok, found the option in Signature Edit for the same.

 Thanks & Regards,

Rad.

[quote user="Steffan"]

That option already exists. When saving an attachment to a particular directory, you can set that directory as your favourite directory.

Cheers!

[/quote]

Hi Steffan,

Thanks for pointing out. Had missed that one while saving....

Regards,

Rad.

My wife wrote an email and then oddly chose "new mail" as the place to file it!

The system did not protest (and testing indicates the mail was sent) but no copy appears to be saved anywhere.

This could be something with my current setup not sure.

When you search a folder for a subset of messages, select one message and open it (MDI mode NOT preview). Now try to use the Read Next/Prev arrows top left tool bar (red/blue icons). They do not work as expected, could be related to being a Link Folder not sure.

Has anyone else run into this?

If possible a future version of Pegasus handling this would be great. Current Pegasus v4.52 WinXP Pro SP3

Not a member of the '1000' but have been supporting via Paypal when possible over the years.

Thank you

Hi.

When I receive a digest mail from a special interest group, it is good to sort the messages in that digest by subject, or thread.   This Peg' can do, but within that subject or thread, the messages are listed out of order time wise.  The same happens with regular messages in any mailbox.

Is there some way (or if not, consider this a "Feature Request") for the message sort routine, to sort by subject first, then date/time, so as to make reading a thread much easier.

Thanks.

Dave

[quote user="PaulW"]There are people who use third party sig generators now, but I don't know if graphics are included.[/quote]

Hi Paul,

There is this excellent S/w called Quotes from qliner.com, but unfortunately it integrates only with MS Outlook.

But on the other hand, it creates a text file which may be used in PMail if the path to this file can be defined for PMail to pick it up while generating new mail / reply etc.

Currently I am copying the contents of this text file generated by Quotes into PMail mails, and it works just fine.

If it can be automated, nothing like it. Hence the query.

Thanks & Regards,

Rad.

radhx has two good points there. I have occasionally made the same wish as his first point myself. I imagine that if one had many autofilter rules, his second point would become useful too.

I would also note that I don't seem to be able to find a way to access the autofilter management screen via the menus. One has to right-click a folder it seems. Is that the only way to discover the feature? Surely it should be under Tools | Mail Filtering Rules...

I would suggest that if you get so many messages that can be deleted, they are probably recognizable as such both visually, as well as by setting up filters. All that is necessary is to direct the *hits* to the Deleted folder, where they can be examined before permanent deleting them.

If it is just junk mail that you are removing, you should really set up Spamhalter or Content Control in Pegasus Mail, or setup an external mail checking agent to analyse the probability of garbage content (examples are Popfile and K9 which both *learn* as they get used)

Your keyboard suggestion would be difficult to implement as keyboard keys are sent to all open windows within Pegasus Mail.

Martin

I agree, it would be a nice addition.

Not a native (builtin function) but Fookes Software does have an application called Mailbag Assistant that will do as you request. Many companies are required by both law or internal procedures to archive all mail and this is one method of making it happen.

see for more information:

http://www.fookes.com/mailbag/ 

With this you can archive/search/export or view by saved folders as you wish.

[quote user="Pega"]Did you read what I was writing? [/quote]

No, I just felt like writing something stupid.

I hadn't noticed that facility and it is useful one for spam protection and much else.  It would be even more useful if it could access multiple mailboxes at once. 

And a simple alternative:  Send the message with its attachment to yourself as a CC:

Minor advantage, you get to see what your recipient receives

Martin

Further, could forwarded messages be included in the count of messages waiting to be sent at the bottom of the pegasus window?  and in the system message window?  I find the current system a nuisance. 

[quote user="Nikolas"]

"Debian looks however you want it to look. As I said, if you can't configure it, use Ubuntu."

True, but why bother when Ubuntu has already got it installed by default?

[/quote]Because you won't have to put up with what Ubuntu calls a 'stable' release, and then reinstall every six months.

Setting a wallpaper, icon & window theme is hardly a taxing endeavor.

[quote]"Maybe you should stop telling people how great you are, that's probably why people respond to you in such a fashion."

I haven't stated 'I am so great' anywhere on this forum.. so this just tells me you suffer an inferiority complex.

[/quote]...yeah...ok.

[quote]"If you had any knowledge of linux you would recognize the idiocy of that statement."

Really? Why is that?

[/quote]Try dropping a kernel from say Fedora into your Ubuntu install and see what happens.

There are some fairly major differences between distro's in how they modify the vanilla kernels, not to mention toolchains, packaging mechanisms, dependency tracking, filesystem types and organisation, as well as build guidelines and overall philosophy.

[quote]"I thought you were ranting about the optional html renderer in a mail CLIENT. What has that got to do with 'a server target market'."

The subject still is MERCURY/PMAIL, but your post failed to mention them, instead, floated around the fact that you spend your Saturday nights in bed analyzing peoples edited posts on an internet forums. Also, like I stated: I believe where there is PMAIL there is MERCURY, hence why I am discussing both of them.

[/quote]For starters it was Sunday morning here :)

The subject purports to be "Feedback" in the "Pegasus Mail Suggestions" subforum, so I still fail to see the relevance of your point about "server target market" in this context.

If you actually read the announcement , idw clearly explains the reasons for the (optional) extension, why he chose IE, the addressing of security concerns, AND the opinion that other engines could also be used. (Maybe it will happen if someone wants to get off their arse and do the

work, rather than act like an ignorant tit and just bitch about it...)

The 'open source' model you are touting so vociferously, is not just about "free stuff", but more about the open collaboration and sharing of knowledge and effort for the benefit of all.

You don't do yourself or your argument (you did have one didn't you?) any favours by pissing and moaning when someone else serves the wrong flavor of "free stuff" to you.