Hi all !
I just wanted to make a suggestion to David concerning the so-called progress reports that pop out from time to time.
It seems that he somehow "suffers" to not be able to make them as often as he wants.
Since Pegasus is a one-developer team (for the core parts because for the rest he can count on a great community), I suggest what follows.
Make only 3 reports per year, one every four months. So if the first one is on the 1st of January, then the 2nd would on the 1st of May and the 3rd on the 1st of September.
If this "routine" was to be accepted, I believe it would simplify David's tasks regarding progress reports and there is a good chance he could say goodbye to what I qualified using the word "suffers".
Why ? In my opinion, because the effort needed would only be to get used to a rhythm. There would not be any thinking regarding the time that went by since the last reports.
Also, if it happens that one of the above dates does not get a progress report "published" or posted, then by itself it would indicate that David could not do it for a good reason. He would not need to eventually give an explanation later as to why there was a miss.
So what do you think ?
Cheers.
Hi all !
I just wanted to make a suggestion to David concerning the so-called progress reports that pop out from time to time.
It seems that he somehow "suffers" to not be able to make them as often as he wants.
Since Pegasus is a one-developer team (for the core parts because for the rest he can count on a great community), I suggest what follows.
Make only 3 reports per year, one every four months. So if the first one is on the 1st of January, then the 2nd would on the 1st of May and the 3rd on the 1st of September.
If this "routine" was to be accepted, I believe it would simplify David's tasks regarding progress reports and there is a good chance he could say goodbye to what I qualified using the word "suffers".
Why ? In my opinion, because the effort needed would only be to get used to a rhythm. There would not be any thinking regarding the time that went by since the last reports.
Also, if it happens that one of the above dates does not get a progress report "published" or posted, then by itself it would indicate that David could not do it for a good reason. He would not need to eventually give an explanation later as to why there was a miss.
So what do you think ?
Cheers.