Thomas, hello, & thanks,
OK, I had not done that for this
installation, in fact since I have a network installation I had ignored
the Standalone thing completely.
So from the server I ran
pconfig and edited the paths to \\Alcyone\C\PMAIL\MAIL\~n . I checked
the .cfg file and this was now twice correctly listed there.
No success, it still gives the exact-same error.
I
also tried ~8 instead of ~n with no change (both of these are listed as
replacements for the user name in the "Reply address format" section of
the User Gateway Definition).
The standalone installation on the workstation that I am using
instead has its pmail.cfg with this same UNC path and runs, no problem.
So I suppose I should not complain, but I hate being beat.
There are a finite number of areas where I can fiddle.
- The Properties of the desktop shortcut
- Pconfig, the Standalone installation
- Pconfig, the Gateway definition
I have just rechecked all three areas and can find nothing. Are there any other relevant areas of configuration to investigate.
Running Win2000 I have checked permissions on access to the
folders and all are fine. In any event the standalone installation
runs, and on the old machine that sat where this workstation is now we
had also a successful installation using the server mailboxes.
So,
knowing the demands on your time, I have to say is there anything else
that could be the cause as I am sure 1 - 3 above are 100%
I did
see some other posts here on this matter and can see that I am not the
first in this mess. I love Pegasus and have used it since DOS versions
without a break. I have to say that installations are always a problem,
generally I feel on account of the choices available and the
explanations given them. Not that anything said is incorrect, but maybe
across cultures the meaning does not always show clearly. I can put
some wants on the relevant list, but nothing will make me use anything
other than Pegasus. When it goes, it is the best!
My next step
will be to run wssetup on the server and see if I can get such an
installation to run from there. I'll keep you posted.
Regards
Anne
<p>Thomas, hello, &amp; thanks,</p><p>&nbsp;OK, I had not done that for this
installation, in fact since I have a network installation I had ignored
the Standalone thing completely. </p><p>So from the server I ran
pconfig and edited the paths to&nbsp; \\Alcyone\C\PMAIL\MAIL\~n . I checked
the .cfg file and this was now twice correctly listed there. </p><p>No success, it still gives the exact-same error. </p><p>I
also tried ~8 instead of ~n with no change (both of these are listed as
replacements for the user name in the "Reply address format" section of
the User Gateway Definition).
</p><p>The standalone installation on the workstation that I am using
instead has its pmail.cfg with this same UNC path and runs, no problem.
So I suppose I should not complain, but I hate being beat.</p><p>There are a finite number of areas where I can fiddle.</p>
<ol><li>The Properties of the desktop shortcut</li><li>Pconfig, the Standalone installation</li><li>Pconfig, the Gateway definition</li></ol>
<p>I have just rechecked all three areas and can find nothing. Are there any other relevant areas of configuration to investigate.
</p><p>Running Win2000 I have checked permissions on access to the
folders and all are fine. In any event the standalone installation
runs, and on the old machine that sat where this workstation is now we
had also a successful installation using the server mailboxes.</p><p>&nbsp;So,
knowing the demands on your time, I have to say is there anything else
that could be the cause as I am sure 1 - 3 above are 100%</p><p>&nbsp;I did
see some other posts here on this matter and can see that I am not the
first in this mess. I love Pegasus and have used it since DOS versions
without a break. I have to say that installations are always a problem,
generally I feel on account of the choices available and the
explanations given them. Not that anything said is incorrect, but maybe
across cultures the meaning does not always show clearly. I can put
some wants on the relevant list, but nothing will make me use anything
other than Pegasus. When it goes, it is the best!</p><p>My next step
will be to run wssetup on the server and see if I can get such an
installation to run from there. I'll keep you posted.&nbsp;</p><p>Regards</p>Anne