[quote user="Peter Strömblad"]
Out of curiosity: Why do you detest RDP?
[/quote]
I have found it very slow, and lacking in configuration options.
By contrast ultraVNC is very easy to adjust the encoding & compression among many other options like screen scaling, colour depth etc so it can be tuned to be very fast over most connections (I have used over dial up quite successfully). It also includes a remote file transfer facility & is dead easy to put through an SSH tunnel.
The "single-click" executable version (~160k one .exe no installation, I have it on my webserver for people to click on [:D]) is runnable by 'support clients' to call back to me, bypassing firewall configuration issues if I had to try and connect to a server running on their machine.
I used it to fix an email issue on a client's laptop on a public wireless link in North Carolina from my lounge room in New Zealand :)
Over an enterprise, or Local LAN, RDP may be perfectly adequate, but it doesn't fit my needs.
[quote user="Peter Strömblad"]<p>Out of curiosity: Why do you detest RDP?</p><p>[/quote]</p><p>I have found it very slow, and lacking in configuration options.</p><p>By contrast ultraVNC is very easy to adjust the encoding &amp; compression among many other options like screen scaling, colour depth etc so it can be tuned to be very fast over most connections (I have used over dial up quite successfully). It also includes a remote file transfer facility &amp; is dead easy to put through an SSH tunnel.</p><p>The "single-click" executable version (~160k one .exe no installation, I have it on my webserver for people to click on [:D]) is runnable by 'support clients' to call back to me, bypassing firewall configuration issues if I had to try and connect to a server running on their machine.</p><p>I used it to fix an email issue on a client's laptop on a public wireless link in North Carolina from my lounge room in New Zealand :)
</p><p>Over an enterprise, or Local LAN, RDP may be perfectly adequate, but it doesn't fit my needs.
</p>