Paul, thanks for your interest in the problem.
> Usually when outgoing messages fail to arrive, I start looking at the configuration.
Me too - first thing I did. All as should be. In fact I have not found anything different in any aspect that I can think of. I am an experienced systems analyst and programmer, so you can talk dirty to me, but telecommunications have always been a happy user experience rather than an area I have ever needed to get to grips with.
> Do you use a relay host and how do you authenticate?
I am not familiar with the usage of the terms in the question. The SMTP server address of my ISP has 'mail.xxxxxxx.co.uk' format, where the x's represent the ISP name. Presumably this might be a relay, but I would guess the server is located at the ISP.
If by authenticate you mean the username / password pair, the dial up section in the Connections tab in Internet Options (Control panel) specifies those, and they are as they should be. If these were wrong, I would have expected some sort of response from the postmaster at the ISP rejecting the transmissions.
The total absence of any error or objection messages from any quarter is one very puzzling aspect of this incident. In fact, if I had not decided to send a test message to one of my other PMail identities, I would not have known about delivery failure until much later. Everything looks and behaves normally.
> Have you got an internet log from your failed transfer?
Don't know. If something somewhere in the XP system keeps a log, I would be interested in knowing how to access it.
The Sygate firewall logs just record the result of permissions and filters either as a pass or a block. So the log shows PMail being allowed to send outgoing transmissions whenever I have sent mail, but nothing is known about what happens to them thereafter.
I am not quite sure where Sygate sits in the chain of events after I click the PMail send button. However, thinking about that has sparked a train of thought and memories. There at least two other common ingredients with SMTP transmissions from PMail. One is Windows sockets, and the other is the DSL. If the DSL was having a problem I would have expected some sort of error message or maybe a failure of incoming mail (which has not happened).
However, Microsoft's sockets are something else. I would not be surprised by anything from them, including total silence about a change of behaviour. And that reminds me of two other things which may or may not be related to the problem.
First, I have found that I can get e-mail delivered to anybody I want by using a web-mail account with another ISP. The account is not directly accessible to Pegasus, and I have to browse to the web site and use their mail client. But it works - presumably because when I click the send button there, their software and server are working independently of both my machine and my broadband ISP's server.
This narrows the list of suspects - and we come back to Winsock. I was trying to help a friend set up his copy of PMail to send mail. It had been sending mail, but had stopped when he replaced his 56Kb modem with broadband. The change did not affect his incoming mail. So, eventually, I got to browsing through the PMail Prefernces and Settings options. I came to the Advanced section in the General settings, and one of the choices there is to set how WSOCK32.dll is loaded. The default is On Demand Only, and I had never touched that setting ever since it had become available in PMail.
The other choices are Never, and Always. I could understand the reasons and logic for these choices. As I now had a fast machine, and oodles of memory I figured that loading the .dll Always would not be a problem, and set that choice. I finished my browsing, closed Pegasus and telephoned my friend with some suggestions for his problem.
To my surprise, when I fired up PMail later, a message immediately appeared "Extension disabled...". Before I could read and digest the remainder, the message was replaced by the main Pegasus window. I guessed that the settings change for WSOCK32.dll loading was responsible and set it back to On Demand Only. No more message. I was drafting a long e-mail, and did some more work on that and closed Pegasus.
E-mail is very important to my current life, and when I returned to my machine later, some instinct prompted me to test the system by sending an e-mail to one of my other PMail identities. Nothing arrived. Many hours later, after much failed testing, and scouring the net for help, I came upon this forum, read the NAV Dropper saga, and joined immediately.
---oOo---
I apologise to Paul and any other Kind Readers for the length of this narrative. Paul's questions sparked a train of thought and memories, and I felt that maybe David Harris or one of his colleagues might be able to throw some light on the WSOCK32.dll episode. (And maybe its relevance, if any, to the vanishing mail problem.)
If there is anything else you want to know about my setup, Paul, everything is available.
<p>Paul, thanks for your interest in the problem.</p><p>&gt; Usually when outgoing messages fail to arrive, I start looking at the configuration.</p><p>Me too - first thing I did. All as should be. In fact I have not found anything different in any aspect that I can think of. I am an experienced systems analyst and programmer, so you can talk dirty to me, but telecommunications have always been a happy user experience rather than an area I have ever needed to get to grips with.</p><p>&nbsp;&gt; Do you use a <b>relay host</b> and how do you <b>authenticate</b>?</p><p>I am not familiar with the usage of the terms in the question. The SMTP server address of my ISP has 'mail.xxxxxxx.co.uk' format, where the x's represent the ISP name. Presumably this might be a relay, but I would guess the server is located at the ISP.
</p><p>If by <b>authenticate</b> you mean the username / password pair, the dial up section in the Connections tab in Internet Options (Control panel) specifies those, and they are as they should be. If these were wrong, I would have expected some sort of response from the postmaster at the ISP rejecting the transmissions.</p><p>The total absence of any error or objection messages from any quarter is one very puzzling aspect of this incident. In fact, if I had not decided to send a test message to one of my other PMail identities, I would not have known about delivery failure until much later. Everything looks and behaves normally.</p><p>&gt; Have you got an internet log from your failed transfer?
</p><p>&nbsp;Don't know. If something somewhere in the XP system keeps a log, I would be interested in knowing how to access it.
</p><p>The Sygate firewall logs just record the result of permissions and filters either as a pass or a block. So the log shows PMail being allowed to send outgoing transmissions whenever I have sent mail, but nothing is known about what happens to them thereafter.</p><p>I am not quite sure where Sygate sits in the chain of events after I click the PMail send button. However, thinking about that has sparked a train of thought and memories. There at least two other common ingredients with SMTP transmissions from PMail. One is Windows sockets, and the other is the DSL. If the DSL was having a problem I would have expected some sort of error message or maybe a failure of incoming mail (which has not happened).</p><p>However, Microsoft's sockets are something else. I would not be surprised by anything from them, including total silence about a change of behaviour. And that reminds me of two other things which may or may not be related to the problem.</p><p>First, I have found that I can get e-mail delivered to anybody I want by using a web-mail account with another ISP. The account is not directly accessible to Pegasus, and I have to browse to the web site and use their mail client. But it works - presumably because when I click the send button there, their software and server are working independently of both my machine and my broadband ISP's server.</p><p>This narrows the list of suspects - and we come back to Winsock. I was trying to help a friend set up his copy of PMail to send mail. It had been sending mail, but had stopped when he replaced his 56Kb modem with broadband. The change did not affect his incoming mail. So, eventually, I got to browsing through the PMail Prefernces and Settings options. I came to the Advanced section in the General settings, and one of the choices there is to set how&nbsp; WSOCK32.dll is loaded. The default is On Demand Only, and I had never touched that setting ever since it had become available in PMail.</p><p>The other choices are Never, and Always. I could understand the reasons and logic for these choices. As I now had a fast machine, and oodles of memory I figured that loading the .dll Always would not be a problem, and set that choice. I finished my browsing, closed Pegasus and telephoned my friend with some suggestions for his problem.</p><p>To my surprise,&nbsp; when I fired up PMail later, a message immediately appeared "Extension disabled...". Before I could read and digest the remainder, the message was replaced by the main Pegasus window. I guessed that the settings change for WSOCK32.dll loading was responsible and set it back to On Demand Only. No more message. I was drafting a long e-mail, and did some more work on that and closed Pegasus.</p><p>E-mail is very important to my current life, and when I returned to my machine later, some instinct prompted me to test the system by sending an e-mail to one of my other PMail identities. Nothing arrived. Many hours later, after much failed testing, and scouring the net for help, I came upon this forum, read the NAV Dropper saga, and joined immediately.</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; ---oOo---</p><p>I apologise to Paul and any other Kind Readers for the length of this narrative. Paul's questions sparked a train of thought and memories, and I felt that maybe David Harris or one of his colleagues might be able to throw some light on the WSOCK32.dll episode. (And maybe its relevance, if any, to the vanishing mail problem.)</p><p>If there is anything else you want to know about my setup, Paul, everything is available.
</p><p>&nbsp;</p>