I ask this because Verizon may soon require SSL POP3/SMTP connections,
but our active SPAM/AV protection by NIS2012 requires email traffic
to be locally visible via port 110 and port 25 connections. We
have multiple home systems,all using NIS2012, and switching
is not practical.
My thought was that the port 25 & 110 paths could be maintained
locally by having the email client connect to Mercury on the same
system via ports 110/25, but with Mercury in turn interacting
with the ISP's POP3/SMTP hosts over SSLconnections. This would allow normal
SPAM/AV scanning to occur as it does now while using SSL connections
to the ISP's mail hosts.
Documentation suggests that this might not work because MercuryC
would appear to the ISP to be a relay and therefore be blocked, despite
the fact it is only associated with system local clients. I'm also
concerned, given the flexibility and configuration options for Mercury,
that the home-system's configuration and management requirements could be excessive.
Does anybody know if using Mercury as a simple email proxy client
in the manner suggested above is workable?
<p>I ask this because Verizon may soon require SSL POP3/SMTP connections,
but our active SPAM/AV protection by NIS2012 requires email traffic
to be locally visible via port 110 and port 25 connections. We
have multiple home systems,all using NIS2012, and switching
is not practical.
My thought was that the port 25 &amp; 110 paths could be maintained
locally by having the email client connect to Mercury on the same
system via ports 110/25, but with Mercury in turn interacting
with the ISP's POP3/SMTP hosts over SSLconnections.&nbsp; This would allow normal
SPAM/AV scanning to occur as it does now while using SSL connections
to the ISP's mail hosts.
Documentation suggests that this might not work because MercuryC
would appear to the ISP to be a relay and therefore be blocked, despite
the fact it is only associated with system local clients. I'm also
concerned, given the flexibility and configuration options for Mercury,
that the home-system's configuration and management requirements could be excessive.
Does anybody know if using Mercury as a simple email proxy client
in the manner suggested above is workable?
</p>