[quote user="Thomas R. Stephenson"]
It does not have to be the users username and password either. I use the same one for all the users when coming in via SquirrelMail. Many mail client also allow you to set ESMTP authorization username and password.
[/quote]
Ok, I guess that's not so bad. However, it would be much more secure to use the Novell passwords as each user has a unique pw, and they can be force-updated on a regular cycle.
[quote user="Thomas R. Stephenson"]
And how would David Harris make money developing, managing and updating this "open source" program?
[/quote]
That's a good question. I've never authored an Open Source project before, though I've worked on many.
I would like to point out that many people use Dave's software because it is free (as in beer). If they are paying for it now, why would they be tempted to pay any less for a product that offers them more? I would think that a corporation would be more willing to support a product that they can rely on to never disappear. What happens if Dave decides to simply call it quits (he has threatened before)? Will he sell Mercury to someone else? How much will they charge?
An open source product will never die, and the price of usage is always the same. I think most OS projects make money by prioritizing updates, and/or providing support. Dave really only charges for support right now anyways, so he's really not doing anything different than the OS folks, other than preventing scores of developers from helping him for free.
You may find better answers from the authors of successful open source commercial projects like Zimbra, SugarCRM and the like.
<p>[quote user="Thomas R. Stephenson"]
It does not have to be the users username and password either.&nbsp; I use the same one for all the users when coming in via SquirrelMail.&nbsp; Many mail client also allow you to set ESMTP authorization username and password.
[/quote]</p><p>Ok, I guess that's not so bad.&nbsp; However, it would be much more secure to use the Novell passwords as each user has a unique pw, and they can be force-updated on a regular cycle.
[quote user="Thomas R. Stephenson"]
And how would David Harris make money developing, managing and updating this "open source" program? &nbsp;
[/quote]</p><p>That's a good question.&nbsp; I've never authored an Open Source project before, though I've worked on many.
</p><p>I would like to point out that many people use Dave's software because it is free (as in beer).&nbsp; If they are paying for it now, why would they be tempted to pay any less for a product that offers them more?&nbsp; I would think that a corporation would be more willing to support a product that they can rely on to never disappear.&nbsp; What happens if Dave decides to simply call it quits (he has threatened before)?&nbsp; Will he sell Mercury to someone else?&nbsp; How much will they charge?
</p><p>An open source product will never die, and the price of usage is always the same.&nbsp; I think most OS projects make money by prioritizing updates, and/or providing support.&nbsp; Dave really only charges for support right now anyways, so he's really not doing anything different than the OS folks, other than preventing scores of developers from helping him for free.
</p>You may find better answers from the authors of successful open source commercial projects like Zimbra, SugarCRM and the like.