In 10 years, on serveral networks and with a variety of printers, I had never seen pmail have the problems you describe.
And then I realized that the reason I evidently never saw the problem was because I always use stock printer drivers, i.e. ones that come with the system.
It is nonetheless strange that pmail would have a display dependency on a printer. For pre-print rendering, ok, but for display? Different resolution, size, and no margin or page length restrictions. And pmail still works fine even if there is no printer installed at all. Further, whatever the dependency is, it can't possibly be comparable to office/pdf where footnotes and headers/footers/margins/line lengths have to display as printed. Pmail, like any web browser also, is neither strictly wysiwyg, nor does it aspire to become that. Mail - like the web and in contrast to office/pdf - is a screen-targeted medium.
<p>In 10 years, on serveral networks and with a variety of printers, I had never seen pmail have the problems you describe.
</p><p>And then I realized that the reason I evidently never saw the problem was because I always use stock printer drivers, i.e. ones that come with the system.</p><p>It is nonetheless strange that pmail would have a display dependency on a printer. For pre-print rendering, ok, but for display? Different resolution, size, and no margin or page length restrictions. And pmail still works fine even if there is no printer installed at all. Further, whatever the dependency is, it can't possibly be comparable to office/pdf where footnotes and headers/footers/margins/line lengths have to display as printed. Pmail, like any web browser also, is neither strictly wysiwyg, nor does it aspire to become that. Mail - like the web and in contrast to office/pdf - is a screen-targeted medium.
</p>