Community Discussions and Support
Email date displaying wrong in folder listing view

I did do a search in this forum for this fault, but obviously put in different words, or whatever.

These acknowledgement emails are actually after submitting spam to a reporting system. I will get in contact with them, but not sure they will do anything about it, as their system is probably doing enough for them such that they may not want to fix it.

Thank you.

Cheers

Rod.

<p>I did do a search in this forum for this fault, but obviously put in different words, or whatever.</p><p>These acknowledgement emails are actually after submitting spam to a reporting system. I will get in contact with them, but not sure they will do anything about it, as their system is probably doing enough for them such that they may not want to fix it.</p><p>Thank you.</p><p>Cheers</p><p>Rod.</p>

I have an acknowledgement email being filtered into a folder and when I check that folder, the email's date is adopting the date of the last previous received email in that folder. If I filter the same email into another folder, it adopts a different date, due to the previous email in this other folder having a different date to the first folder.

Any ideas as to what might be going on?

Thank you.

Rod.

 

<p>I have an acknowledgement email being filtered into a folder and when I check that folder, the email's date is adopting the date of the last previous received email in that folder. If I filter the same email into another folder, it adopts a different date, due to the previous email in this other folder having a different date to the first folder.</p><p>Any ideas as to what might be going on?</p><p>Thank you.</p><p>Rod.</p><p mce_keep="true"> </p>

The message probably has improperly formatted date and time on the date: line. We would need to see the full header portion only of the raw view of the message - just from the first blank line up to the top of header portion. The date and time requirement of RFC5322 is fixed and rigid and there can be no variance.

The message probably has improperly formatted date and time on the date: line. We would need to see the full header portion only of the raw view of the message - just from the first blank line up to the top of header portion. The date and time requirement of RFC5322 is fixed and rigid and there can be no variance.

Return-path: <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Envelope-to: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:18:18 +1000

Received: from xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

by xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

(envelope-from <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>)

id 1URec9-000EzT-VB

for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:18:18 +1000

Received: from xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

by xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (xxxxxxxxxxxxx Safemail) with esmtp (envelope-from <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>)

id 1URec9-000HDP-Ns

for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:18:13 +1000

Received: from xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (HELO xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) ([xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx])

by xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2013 18:12:57 +1000

Received: from xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx])

by xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Postfix) with ESMTP id C534F8200E4

for <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:18:12 +1000 (EST)

From: "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To: <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

X-Virus-1: Scanned and passed by xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx AV Engine 1 (SO)

X-Virus-2: Scanned and passed by xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx AV Engine 2 (CL)

X-SafeMail: Filtered by xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx SafeMail - http://www.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on

 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

X-Spam-Level:

X-Spam-ASN: AS7579 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_DATE,

MISSING_MID shortcircuit=no autolearn=no version=3.3.2

Subject: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2

X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

X-PMFLAGS: 33570816 0 65536 TM9LPM3G.CNM

 

If you need any of the deleted data, please let me know.

Thank you.

Rod

&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;Return-path: &amp;lt;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;Envelope-to: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:18:18 +1000&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;Received: from xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt; by xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt; (envelope-from &amp;lt;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&amp;gt;)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt; id 1URec9-000EzT-VB&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt; for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:18:18 +1000&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;Received: from xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt; by&amp;nbsp;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (xxxxxxxxxxxxx Safemail) with esmtp (envelope-from &amp;lt;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&amp;gt;)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt; id 1URec9-000HDP-Ns&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt; for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:18:13 +1000&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;Received: from&amp;nbsp;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (HELO xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) ([xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx])&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt; by&amp;nbsp;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2013 18:12:57 +1000&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;Received: from&amp;nbsp;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx])&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt; by&amp;nbsp;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Postfix) with ESMTP id C534F8200E4&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt; for &amp;lt;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&amp;gt;; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:18:12 +1000 (EST)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;From: &quot;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&quot; &amp;lt;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;To: &amp;lt;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;X-Virus-1: Scanned and passed by&amp;nbsp;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx AV Engine 1 (SO)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;X-Virus-2: Scanned and passed by&amp;nbsp;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx AV Engine 2 (CL)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;X-SafeMail: Filtered by&amp;nbsp;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx SafeMail - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/&quot; mce_href=&quot;http://www.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/&quot;&gt;http://www.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;X-Spam-Level: &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;X-Spam-ASN: AS7579 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_DATE,&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt; MISSING_MID shortcircuit=no autolearn=no version=3.3.2&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;Subject:&amp;nbsp;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;X-PMFLAGS: 33570816 0 65536 TM9LPM3G.CNM &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot; mce_keep=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;If you need any of the deleted data, please let me know.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;LEFT&quot;&gt;Rod&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;

The Date: field is missing, so Pegasus Mail is completely unable to display a proper date.

Sven

&lt;p&gt;The Date: field is missing, so Pegasus Mail is completely unable to display a proper date.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sven &lt;/p&gt;

So there's a bug in Pegasus, as it's failing to clear the date field after listing another email?

If there isn't a valid date field, shouldn't the date of the email default to 01/01/1900, or something like that?

Thank you.

Cheers

&lt;p&gt;So there&#039;s a bug in Pegasus, as it&#039;s failing to clear the date field after listing another email?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If there isn&#039;t a valid date field, shouldn&#039;t the date of the email default to 01/01/1900, or something like that?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;/p&gt;

[quote user="rocket"]

So there's a bug in Pegasus, as it's failing to clear the date field after listing another email?

If there isn't a valid date field, shouldn't the date of the email default to 01/01/1900, or something like that?[/quote]

This has been discussed before - see thread http://community.pmail.com/forums/thread/29539.aspx

Your message is also missing a "Message-id:" header which is another required field.  I only see these problems in spam, but it would be better not to have an adjacent message date repeated.  If your message is definitely wanted, I would get onto the sender to question why it is so malformed - many anti-spam systems would block it.

[quote user=&quot;rocket&quot;] &lt;P&gt;So there&#039;s a bug in Pegasus, as it&#039;s failing to clear the date field after listing another email?&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;If there isn&#039;t a valid date field, shouldn&#039;t the date of the email default to 01/01/1900, or something like that?[/quote]&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;This has been discussed before - see thread &lt;A href=&quot;http://community.pmail.com/forums/thread/29539.aspx&quot;&gt;http://community.pmail.com/forums/thread/29539.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Your message is also missing a &quot;Message-id:&quot; header which is another required field.&amp;nbsp; I only see these problems&amp;nbsp;in spam, but&amp;nbsp;it would be better not to have an adjacent message date repeated.&amp;nbsp; If your message is definitely&amp;nbsp;wanted, I would get onto the sender to question why it is so malformed - many anti-spam systems would block it.&lt;/P&gt;
live preview
enter atleast 10 characters
WARNING: You mentioned %MENTIONS%, but they cannot see this message and will not be notified
Saving...
Saved
With selected deselect posts show selected posts
All posts under this topic will be deleted ?
Cancel
Delete
Pending draft ... Click to resume editing
Discard draft