I'm using PMail 4.70 with IMAP, running PMail with Michael's PMDebug/Minidump program. When I close the IMAP connection, about half the time - and I can't yet predict when - PMDebug creates a crash dump. Hardly a major problem, but I have to ignore or delete the saved message next time I close and open PMail.
My IMAP mailbox has a large number of nested folders. When I open up the tree under a folder by clicking on the plus sign, I sometimes open up apparent multiple copies (between 2 and 5) of each subfolder in the folder pane. I can't reproduce this reliably; it may involve double- or multiple clicking of the mouse, and it occasionally happened with previous versions of PMail as well. But my impression is that it's easier to do now. Again, no more than a minor annoyance.
Finally, a question. Is the problem with cursor position after line-wrapping likely to be still present? This was a bug in the TER editor, as I recall, and it could be a serious annoyance. I haven't seen it yet, but maybe I've just been lucky so far with 4.70.
best
David
<p>I'm using PMail 4.70 with IMAP, running PMail with Michael's PMDebug/Minidump program. When I close the IMAP connection, about half the time - and I can't yet predict when - PMDebug creates a crash dump. Hardly a major problem, but I have to ignore or delete the saved message next time I close and open PMail.
</p><p>My IMAP mailbox has a large number of nested folders. When I open up the tree under a folder by clicking on the plus sign, I sometimes open up apparent multiple copies (between 2 and 5) of each subfolder in the folder pane. I can't reproduce this reliably; it may involve double- or multiple clicking of the mouse, and it occasionally happened with previous versions of PMail as well. But my impression is that it's easier to do now. Again, no more than a minor annoyance.
</p><p>Finally, a question. Is the problem with cursor position after line-wrapping likely to be still present? This was a bug in the TER editor, as I recall, and it could be a serious annoyance. I haven't seen it yet, but maybe I've just been lucky so far with 4.70.</p><p>best
David
</p><p>&nbsp;</p>