Community Discussions and Support

The perfect forum for general discussions or technical questions about Mercury Mail Server.

0
-1
closed
Rolf Lindby posted Jan 4 '08 at 3:39 am

Yes, S in that position should stop all transaction filtering:

To understand the difference between the 'X' and 'S' actions, you need to be aware that transaction filtering is done in several "passes", each pass testing a different state of the SMTP transaction. The 'X' action only exits from the current pass, meaning that future passes will still take place. The 'S' action, however, exits from the current pass and suppresses all further transaction filtering on the message altogether.
So if that doesn't work you will need to check that the expression in "*theserver*" actually does match the server's HELO string (and of course make sure that you want the rule to trigger on no hit if you put N in the 3rd position).


/Rolf
0
-1
closed
Thomas R. Stephenson posted Dec 30 '07 at 4:09 am

[quote user="bpczi"]

Hi!

I am a newbie and someone is trying to send mails via my mercury installation. There were about 13.000 Mails in the queue which I have deleted!

What I have to configure that my mercury installation is more safe? I have activated the checkboxes

Do not permit SMTP relaying of non local mail

and

Use strict local relaying restrictions

Now he can not send mails but it causes a lot of traffic because he is trying and trying...

Is there a way to configure mercury so, that smtp is only allowed after authentication? Or is there a better way to counteract against that? Is it better to use another port than 25?

What do you prefer in such a case? 

I am very sorry about my bad English and i hope, that you understand my problem!

Many thanks for your help!

best regards

 bpczi
 [/quote]

Turning off relaying is a start.   You can turn on the authentication for relaying but it's not going to help here since it will not keep him from trying.  You may be able to block his IP address from sending at all and that will help reduce the load.  The basic point is you have blocked the relaying and after awhile he'll go away.

 

 

0
-1
closed
lbarryb posted Jan 2 '08 at 1:41 pm

"Is the mail being sent to  user@broadoak.co.uk then being redirected to Mercury as SMTP mail?"

  • Yes exactly that.

"If so have you told the router to send all mail for port 25 to the LAN IP address of the system running Mercury/32? "

  • This has now been done - it works fine ... and I now know a lot more about how the router works.

Many thanks for your help and a Happy New Year to you.

0
-1

[quote user="feamster"]I'd like to have mail end up in specific folders based on what is in the subject.  I'd prefer to have it occur at the server level instead of at the client level.  Example: If the word cnet is in the from field I can place it into my imap tech folder automatically.  I saw forwarding, copy, moving,saving to disk as actions but didn't really see anything that would do this.  Thanks[/quote]

Sorry, can't be done.  Mercury/32 knows nothing about the users mail folders when delivering the mail. 

 

0
-1

Hello Rolf, 

I take your point and as I said, that is what we are focussing on, and I already have and use Second Copy. I just wondered if, knowing that things like interference, wireless blips etc can cause crashes, I just wondered if there is a better way to do this. I can use the software I already have, with all the different copy options: Synchronise source and destination to match exactly; Exact Copy - copy source to destination, delete obsolete files from destination.

Ellie 

 

0
-1

It's possible to change the mail server account name to something else than maiser by editing the Maiser: line in mercury.ini. I haven't found a way to modify the description in the confirmation mail, though, or the sender for the welcome mail, as no headers are included in the template files. But maybe someone else knows a way.

/Rolf 

0
-1
closed
Rolf Lindby posted May 29 '09 at 6:23 pm

The encryption library used by Mercury for SSL can apparently only handle certificates that were created by the program itself at present. As Peter said, this is an important issue that will need to be addressed in future releases.

/Rolf 

0
-1
closed
Rolf Lindby posted Dec 12 '07 at 7:01 pm

There is some specific external reason for this behavior. A few things to check:

- Is there a real time anti-virus scanner running on the server? If it shouldn't be shut down then at least exclude Mercury directories from scanning.
- Is the disk that Mercury resides on error-free, and is there sufficient disk space available?
- Is there some broken message file stuck in the queue directory?

/Rolf
 

0
-1
closed
Rolf Lindby posted Dec 8 '07 at 2:42 am

I assume you are running the MercuryE module for SMTP delivery? To get more information please switch on detailed logging in that module, send a short test message, switch off detailed logging again and post the result here.

Mail handler for the domain druifjes.nl is druifjes.nl with IP 72.29.64.240. mail.druifjes.nl is a CNAME for druifjes.nl, mailserver.druifjes.nl is apparently not registered in DNS. IP 72.29.64.240 is available and reports host name dime87.dizinc.com. There is however an Exim mailserver answering there, not Mercury:

220-dime87.dizinc.com ESMTP Exim 4.68 #1 Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:39:57 -0500

/Rolf



 

0
-1
closed
Cls posted Dec 11 '07 at 3:56 pm

Hi Rolf

Thank you for taking the time to respond.

I had increased the TCP/IP timeout to 180 seconds. That seems to work. I'm not seeing the errors now.  I'm also going to follow Thomas Stephenson's advise, and get the utility to run the MTU test.

Again, thank you.

Compton 

 

0
-1
closed
Greenman posted Dec 13 '07 at 9:45 am

Hi Paul, thanks for your response.

The trial was being conducted externally.

We now know what happened - when the tester set up IMAP, instead of using the MercuryS server address for SMTP authentication, they used their own ISP. This is why they were still able to send email after the Mercury32 re-installation.

Sorry for the confusion.

0
-1
closed
PiS posted Dec 10 '07 at 3:04 pm

When I tried I didn't manage to resolve tnl-online.net at all. The reason for that could have been that the two ns were not in synch - impossible to tell today, since they resolve now, however not valid. f.ex. delphi.tnl-online.net is cname for delphi.tnl-online.com - an mx should point to a record that has an A record - not all resolvers proceed beyond an inital cname since it's not part of the mx-rfc.

0
-1
closed
PiS posted Dec 5 '07 at 10:59 pm

No not with aliases. But there exists a daemon that upon arrival changes the TO address form, so that it looks to be natively to the remotedomain.com and replaces the inbound job in the queue. If the MX-pointers then are in place, the message is routed off host. The daemon is called MXREDIR, located at:

0
-1
closed
Thomas R. Stephenson posted Jul 18 '10 at 12:11 am

> Same question (moving mercury(v4)...and possibly upgrading at same time)...but HAVE to use a different drive letter.
> Do I do a fresh install and copy over all the MAIL folder or is there more to it?

You can simply copy it across to the new drive letter and then open Mercury.ini in an ASCII editor and change all of the references to the drive letter.

2.31k
13.66k
8
Actions
Hide topic messages
Enable infinite scrolling
Previous
Next
All posts under this topic will be deleted ?
Pending draft ... Click to resume editing
Discard draft